The BDS movement at Ottawa’s Carleton University suffered a major setback this weekend, when it voluntarily withdrew its proposed student government resolution that would have targeted Israel for divestment rather than agree to support an amended motion that would have called more generallyfor a socially responsible investment policy,without singling Israel out. In the context of the debate, the BDS campaigners, organized under the name “Students Against Israeli Apartheid”, acknowledged that they did not support the idea of socially responsible investment UNLESS such a policy explicitlyand uniquely targeted Israel for punishment. Quite aside from serving as yet another example of how decent-minded people are successfully standing up to BDS wherever it shows its head, this incident also serves to highlight how far removed from its own progressive rhetoric the BDS “movement” really is.
Academic Boycott, BDS Activity, Campus, Campus, Canada, Divestment, Divestment, Economic Boycott, Economic Interests, Economic Interests, Responding to BDS, University/Research, University/Research
BDS Agenda Flushed Out (and Away) at Canadian University

The political left ideological NDP, are relentless in their activities of resentment and malevolence. Like any bully, they must always be stood up against strongly and quickly. Support for Israel must active and strong, as it is in the fundamental best interest of the western world.
I enjoy looking through an article that can make men and women think. Also, thanks for allowing for me to comment!
I blog often and I truly thank you for your content.
The article has truly peaked my interest. I will bookmark your site and keep checking for new details about once a week.
I opted in for your RSS feed as well.
Hey there, You have done an excellent job. Ill certainly digg it and personally recommend to my friends. I am sure they’ll be benefited from this website.
An attention-grabbing discussion is value comment. I think that it’s best to write more on this subject, it won’t be a taboo topic however usually persons are not sufficient to talk on such topics. To the next. Cheers